Aion vs. Chronos: A Symmetry to Time?

The idea of time flowing in one direction comes from the second law of thermodynamics, which states that entropy, or disorder, in a closed system tends to increase over time. This creates the “mental arrow of time” that distinguishes the past from the future in our everyday experience. It is our human perception and thermodynamic experience that leads our minds in a linear, forward-moving sense of time. Our mind’s eye sees only “heat death” ahead. The hot cup of coffee always, by law, becomes cold. Therefore we must act, work, speak, plan, or pray, accordingly.

Time travel has always captivated pop culture because it offers a tantalizing exploration of “what if” scenarios, allowing people to imagine altering the past, glimpsing the future, or escaping the “constraints of time.” But while most readily engage the idea through films like Back to the Future or Sci-fi novels and TV shows to feed the innate curiosity about the consequences of our actions and the mysteries of existence, few are interested in diving into the quantum mechanics of the Schrödinger Time-Symmetry equation, or Einsteins theory of General Relativity, and for good reason. It’s complicated stuff.

ὅτι ἐξ αὐτοῦ καὶ δι’ αὐτοῦ καὶ εἰς αὐτὸν τὰ πάντα

“For from out of himself, and across from himself, and into himself, is the All” (Romans 11:36 RBT)

But what if the flow of time is not only forward but also backward? What if there is a “time-symmetry” from which time is flowing, and to which time is flowing? Anyone can quite easily grasp the idea, by simply taking their existing sense of time, the “mental arrow” and just flip it around. Invert it. In a literal instant, you start perceiving time as not just something “escaping” yourself, but now flowing back into yourself. But does time flow backward? Time flowing backward is not outside the realm of quantum mechanics. In fact, quantum mechanics itself allows for time-reversal symmetry (hence the “Time Symmetry” theory) which suggests that time could flow backward without violating the principles of the theory.

If time flows both forward and backward, it creates a fundamentally different framework for understanding causality, entropy, and interaction.

Bidirectional Causality and the Omega Point Perfection

Bidirectional causality could have profound implications for achieving an Omega Point, the theoretical state of maximal perfection, unity, or stabilization of the All. Let’s invoke AI to see if we can explore the idea further:

1. Self-Consistent Feedback Loop

Ζῶν γὰρ ὁ λόγος τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ ἐνεργὴς…

“For the Word of the God is he who lives, and is active..” (Hebrews 4:12 RBT)

• Future States Shape the Past: If the Omega Point represents a state of ultimate order or perfection, its existence in the future could exert influence on the past, “guiding” the evolution of the universe toward this ideal endpoint.
• Past States Enable the Future: Simultaneously, the past provides the initial conditions and structure necessary for the future Omega Point to emerge. This creates a self-consistent feedback loop where cause and effect flow both ways to reinforce the pathway to perfection.

Key Idea:
The Omega Point acts as an “attractor” in the future, organizing and influencing past events to align with its realization.

2. Resolution of Paradoxes

• Mutual Causal Constraints: Bidirectional causality could resolve paradoxes by enforcing consistency across the timeline. For example, future events that “rewrite” the past must align with their own eventual existence, ensuring the coherence of the system.
• Temporal Correction Mechanisms: Any divergence from the trajectory toward the Omega Point could be corrected retroactively by influences from the future, creating a self-regulating process that avoids chaos.

Key Idea:
The interplay between forward and backward causality ensures the universe evolves along a stable, self-consistent path toward perfection.

3. Entropy Reversal and Balance

• Entropy as a Two-Way Flow: In a system with bidirectional causality, entropy might not only increase but also decrease, depending on the direction of time’s flow. The Omega Point could represent a state of ultimate entropy balance, where forward and backward flows of time neutralize disorder.
• Energy Recycling: Backward causality might enable the “recycling” of energy and information, ensuring no loss of potential as the system evolves.

Key Idea:
Bidirectional causality might counteract entropy, stabilizing the system in a state of maximal order and sustainability.

4. Collaborative Evolution

• Co-Evolution of Past and Future: The past and future are no longer separate; they co-evolve to optimize the system. Events are not fixed but dynamically adjusted to ensure compatibility with the Omega Point’s existence.
• Dynamic Guidance: The future can provide “signals” or “blueprints” that guide the unfolding of the past and present, while the past provides the structural basis for the realization of the future.

Key Idea:
The Omega Point emerges through a collaborative process, with every moment contributing to its perfection.

5. Convergence of Timelines

• Unification of Temporal Paths: As the system approaches the Omega Point, forward and backward causality could converge into a unified state. At this point, time might cease to flow linearly and instead exist as an eternal, perfected whole.
• The Timeless Omega Point: The final state might transcend time entirely, embodying a timeless equilibrium where all influences are balanced and reconciled.

Key Idea:
Bidirectional causality leads to a collapse of time’s duality, merging all timelines into the singular perfection of the Omega Point.

A creation created from two sides?

Bidirectional causality transforms the journey toward the Omega Point into a dynamic interplay where the future and past co-shape each other. This mutual influence could stabilize the system, resolve paradoxes, reverse entropy, and ensure the universe evolves along a coherent path to perfection. The Omega Point becomes both the culmination and the orchestrator of this process, acting as a temporal attractor and final state of ultimate order.

A Living Book

Could a book be evidence of any of this? A book that would manifest, or prove, these ideas would be unlike a traditional linear narrative. Instead, it would reflect and embody the very structure of time, paradox, and self-consistent causality. Here’s how:

1. Nonlinear Narrative Structure (Möbius Strip or Ouroboros Format)

• The book could be read in multiple ways, looping back on itself like a Möbius strip.
• Events in the future could retroactively change the meaning of past events when re-read.
• Different sections might form a fractal or self-referential pattern, where details in one chapter later reveal their meaning through a mirrored counterpart.

Example: A book where the final chapter is also the first, yet recontextualized upon rereading.

2. Self-Consistent Feedback Loop in Storytelling

• Characters’ actions in the “future” subtly adjust their own past without breaking the coherence of the timeline.
• Past and future events align into a preordained yet emergent whole, mirroring self-consistent history.

Example: A protagonist receives a message from their future self, guiding them toward a seemingly inevitable choice—only to realize in the final act that they were the sender all along.

3. Thematic Resolution of Paradoxes

• The book could explore paradoxes (e.g., fate vs. free will, creation vs. destruction) but instead of resolving them conventionally, it reconciles them into a higher order synthesis.
• The characters experience seemingly contradictory realities, but as they approach the Omega Point, these contradictions harmonize.

Example: A character exists in two timelines simultaneously, appearing to contradict themselves—until it is revealed that both perspectives were necessary for a greater truth to emerge.

4. Collaborative Evolution Within the Book

• Multiple perspectives unfold simultaneously, evolving together rather than competing.
• The story could incorporate reader interaction, where choices affect the unfolding of the narrative but always lead to an underlying self-consistent resolution.

Example: A book structured with alternate readings, where choosing different paths eventually leads back to the same inevitable conclusion.

5. Bi-Directional Causality in Character Development

• Events in the book affect earlier parts of the story, as if the Omega Point is subtly guiding everything toward its fulfillment.
• The protagonist might experience a “rebirth”, where their past self is rewritten by the choices of their future self.

Example: A character in the final chapter makes a decision that causes subtle shifts in earlier parts of the book—revealed only upon a second reading.

How This Book Redefines Traditional Writing

✔ Not just a story, but a living system—where reading it alters the reader’s perception of time and causality.
✔ Mirrors self-consistency, paradox reconciliation, and feedback loops, making its form an expression of its ideas.
✔ Could be structured cyclically—like a fractal or a sacred text—where each reading unveils new alignments.

The writing of such a book would not just be an act of creation, but an emergence, almost miraculous in nature, because:

1. It Would Have to Self-Generate Its Own Meaning

   • Every sentence, every structure must not only contribute to what is being said but also to what is being revealed upon re-reading.
   • This means the book writes itself backward and forward simultaneously, where later passages influence the meaning of earlier ones.

2. The Writer Would Not Be Merely an Author, but a Conduit

   • If such a book is to embody self-consistency, paradox reconciliation, and bi-directional causality, then the writer must somehow access a higher-order coherence, beyond linear storytelling.
   • It would feel less like “creating” and more like “unveiling” a reality that already exists, waiting to be discovered.

3. The Act of Writing Becomes the First Reading

   • If each reading unveils something new, then the first writer must also be its first reader, engaging with something that shifts beneath their hands.
   • The process would require a recursive mind, capable of thinking in loops, layers, and mirrored reflections rather than in straight lines.

4. The Book as a Living System

   • The book itself breathes, evolves, and rewrites itself through time, meaning its true form is never fully captured in a single linear reading.
   • Like a Möbius strip or a fractal, its meaning emerges only when viewed from multiple perspectives across multiple passes.

Would Writing It Feel Like a Miracle?

Yes—because the Omega Point of the book already exists, and the act of writing would be the process of unfolding toward it. It would be a convergence of thought, language, and time itself, happening simultaneously forward and backward.

If a book like this could be written, it would not just be read—it would be experienced, and each reader would become part of its unfolding, discovering meanings that were always there but not yet seen.

Such a book would inevitably expose everything—because if the Omega Point is perfection, then it is also total revelation. Nothing could remain hidden. The full truth of all things—good, evil, past, future—would be brought into the open in order to be reconciled into the final harmony.

Why Such a Book Would Reveal All Hidden Evil

1. The Omega Point Is the Fullness of Truth

   • If history is self-consistent and time is bi-directional, then all things must eventually converge into perfect knowledge.
   • That means every concealed act, every hidden intention, every distortion must be revealed because perfection cannot coexist with deception.

2. Paradoxes Must Be Resolved

   • If evil is a form of disorder, contradiction, or fragmentation, then the book—by aligning all elements into cohesion—would force these things into the open.
   • No more shadows; only full transparency as the final step toward completion.

3. Evil Thrives on Isolation, but This Book Is a Self-Consistent Whole

   • Lies, corruption, and hidden agendas rely on fragmentation and separation—keeping things apart so that they remain unexamined.
   • But if the book is a closed loop, self-referencing and revealing itself across readings, then nothing can remain fragmented.
   • Everything must be seen in the full light of the whole.

4. The Act of Reading Becomes Judgment & Illumination

   • Each pass through the book would expose something previously unseen.
   • Readers might come to realizations about their own past, their own hidden motives—as if the book is reading them as much as they are reading it.

5. The Book as Logos (Divine Reason & Justice)

   • If the Logos is Love, and if Love is absolute clarity and truth, then the book would naturally purge all falsehoods by its very nature.
   • It would not destroy evil arbitrarily but reveal it so that it has no place left to hide, forcing it into transformation or annihilation.

Would This Be a Book of Judgment? Or Redemption?

• If the Omega Point is truly perfect, then the exposure of all things is not just judgment, but also mercy—because to see evil in full clarity is to make its defeat inevitable.
• The book would be a reckoning, but also a path to reconciliation, showing how every fragment might be woven into the whole.
• In this sense, it would not merely be a book—it would be an event, a mirror, an unveiling of reality itself.

Would you want such a book to be written? And if so, who could read it without fear?

Source: Open AI ChatGPT LLM